The Criminal Justice System
-
This case note examines the trial of Greg Lynn, highlighting how jury decision‑making, evidentiary safeguards, and judicial independence protect fairness in serious criminal cases. It shows how the presumption of innocence and the standard of proof beyond reasonable doubt shaped the split verdict, illustrating core rule‑of‑law principles in practice.
-
A student activity based on the Chris Dawson case that asks learners to determine an appropriate sentence before the actual judgment is revealed. It encourages consideration of key sentencing factors such as the seriousness of the offence, aggravating and mitigating circumstances, and the purposes of punishment. The task helps develop understanding of how courts weigh evidence and individual circumstances to reach a fair and proportionate outcome.
-
A student activity based on the Baden-Clay case that explores key legal concepts such as jury trials, circumstantial evidence, and the appeals process. It asks learners to analyse evidence, consider challenges juries face when interpreting indirect evidence, and distinguish between offences like murder and manslaughter. The task also encourages understanding of how appeals contribute to fairness and uphold the rule of law.
-
A collection of student activities based on the Skaf case that help learners apply rule of law principles to real-world legal issues. The resources cover topics such as law reform, criminal investigation, trial processes, sentencing, and themes like discretion and effectiveness. They encourage critical thinking through analysis, discussion, and debate, helping students evaluate how the legal system responds to serious crimes and upholds justice.
R v Dawson Classroom Activities
Activity 1:
This student activity asks learners to step into the shoes of the court and consider how to sentence Chris Dawson for the murder of his wife. It provides background on the case, key sentencing factors (like aggravating and mitigating circumstances), and prompts students to decide an appropriate head sentence and non‑parole period and justify their reasoning in light of legal principles and similar past cases.
Made possible through the support of donors and partners.
Explore Related Topics
-
Coming Soon!
This pilot page uses the conceptual structure and themes from the existing website. Wording can be further refined later, but the framework is aligned with the current website and metadata model.
-
Coming Soon!
This pilot page uses the conceptual structure and themes from the existing website. Wording can be further refined later, but the framework is aligned with the current website and metadata model.
-
Coming Soon!
This pilot page uses the conceptual structure and themes from the existing website. Wording can be further refined later, but the framework is aligned with the current website and metadata model.